Opinions Diverge on Who Calls Valuation Shots When Liquidity is Scarce

By Martin de Sa'Pinto, Senior Financial Correspondent

MONTE CARLO, Monaco (HedgeWorld.com)-The liquidity crunch brought home to many investors, portfolio managers, service providers and prime brokers how sharply valuations can diverge when a portfolio becomes unexpectedly illiquid.

This was particularly true for highly leveraged portfolios that, as the result of not-always-sharp fluctuations in the prices of securities, found themselves facing margin calls and forced to unwind positions rapidly.

The complexity of the security in question is clearly an issue, and when there is a lack of consensus on valuation methods, different constituencies will often make a strong case for completely distinct methods that can produce widely diverging valuations.

This was the basis for a panel discussion at the Global Alternative Investment Management conference in Monaco on June 19 was moderated by Henny Sender, international financial correspondent at the Financial Times.

"Valuation and transparency are among the hottest topics facing hedge funds and investors today," said Ms. Sender in her introduction. "How quickly can valuations change? If you don't have a good sense of valuation you cannot manage the risk of your positions."

In such circumstances, "I was a diehard advocate for mark-to-market, and I still believe it's the lesser of evils, but there are times when model-based pricing might make sense," said Ms. Rahl. This would of course imply that the model-based methodology was favored over mark-to-market because either market prices were stale or unavailable, or the relationship between the underlying and the proxy was weak. "The option of using such a valuation methodology would require strict checks and balances within a fund," she said.

"Marks on the collateral don't necessarily represent the price at which a trade can be unwound," said Ms. Rahl. "In some situations we have seen the exact same trades with two different counterparties being unwound at vastly different prices."

Ms. Rahl said relevant documentation, including research reports, broker quotes and screen shots, should be printed out and kept on file so that it is at least available in the case of a dispute.

July 2008